The Short-Sightedness of the UK Investigatory Powers Bill

It's not so surprising that the United Kingdom would say their Investigatory Powers Bill is timely enough for the situation. After extremists attacked Paris and several other heavily-populated cities in other countries, UK tories would say "we told you so" and would push through with their plans to snoop inside the conversations of millions of Britons nationwide.

This is all in an attempt to thwart terrorist communications, which make use of similar networks such as the Internet.

But Internet and tech companies such as Microsoft, Apple, Google, Facebook and others, said the plan would be a big failure because the technology itself locks out the developers from accessing sensitive information stored in their systems.

A Single Backdoor is a Backdoor For Anyone

According to Apple CEO Tim Cook, a single backdoor they create in their Message App and it would be anyone's backdoor to access another person's private files. The Message App currently has no backdoor and relies on end-to-end encryption wherein the receiver of the message is the only one to read the message. Not even their servers can translate the data.

The bad news is that if Internet and tech companies feel the pressure to create these new technologies, they may end up competing in security against government-sanctioned hackers employed in the ranks to enforce the law in full, if necessary.

So What is Protecting The Rest Of Us From Spies When British MPs Aren't Even?

It would seem GCHQ's eavesdropping crimes did not only reach the civilian level, but also the MP level. British MPs believe laws protect them against spies tapping their communications, but the IPT dismisses these.

We're talking about the case of three MPs who brought forward the fact they can charge GCHQ spies of illegally tapping their communications.

It's a bit confusing I know. Wiretapping is illegal, but it's right that those three politicians were "legally" observed by spies? Confusing.

Ghost Foundations

It's like this. About four decades ago, British Minister Harold Wilson said the MI5 and MI6 cannot tap phones of members of parliament.

That sounded convincing. But it was only a statement. While considered a doctrine, the Harold Wilson statement is part of the UK's "unwritten constitution".

Think of it as a verbal agreement between two people. It's founded on trust. Clearly, the latter does not exist in this situation.

Without any basis in law, the IPT cannot use it. Therefore, there's no MP protection against spies.

False Assurances

Meanwhile, the UK government said it is not giving false assurances to its members. According to them, intelligence agencies did not interfere with their calls. They had also insisted that agencies worked in a manner that they specifically chose their targets.

I don't know what I'm writing as of the moment. All I know is surveillance is illegal and all of this does not make sense.

Legal Firms Turn To Technology and Other Means To Defeat Legal Aid Reduction

O'Garra's Solicitors have once heard cases personally. Moving with technology, websites allowed customers to send inquiry forms and receive free consultation. Now, they've developed software enabling fee-earners to take client instructions digitally and generate client letters and email the files to offices without doing legwork.

The law firm, along with other firms struggling with the UK's decreased legal aid budget focus on improving their efficiency to get more contracts while minimising resource use.

O'Garra's Solicitors and other firms face possible 'limbo' over legal aid deficits as cases and contracts continue to go down the drain.

Meanwhile, Justice Secretary Michael Gove thanked practitioner groups

"Thanks to the constructive dialogue that we have had with them and with [MoJ] civil servants, we are now in talks to ensure that access to justice can be enhanced and, at the same time, that the quality of advocacy improves."

The level of interest in duty contracts, including O'Garra's increased efficiency style, shows the strong urge to take on cases despite the legal aid reductions.

Meanwhile, public reaction to legal aid cuts were negative. Many said the MoJ should have had greater pressure from groups to withdraw the legal aid cuts.

Chelsea Manning Denied Legal Library Access Before Prison Hearing

Imprisoned soldier may face solitary confinement due to violations including possession of unapproved reading material and expired toothpaste. Soldier and Guardian Columnist Chelsea Manning was denied access to a prison legal library days before her prison court hearing. The hearing could result to a decision leaving her in solitary confinement.

The army will schedule a hearing on her violations at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas where Manning is currently held.

Manning was the source of the vast leak of US State Secrets to WikiLeaks. A call to the US disciplinary barracks at Fort Leavenworth was not immediately returned.

American Civil Liberties Union Attorney Chase Strangio, who was handling Manning's legal dispute with the US military over her health treatment in prison as a transgender woman, said it is possible Manning was unfairly targeted.

“Chelsea has a growing voice in the public discussion,” Stangio said, “and it would not surprise me were these charges connected to who she is.”

Petitions against the military to release Manning and drop her of her charges for the reported prison infractions had earned 64,000 signatures. According to Fight for the Future Campaign Director Evan Greer:

“This is a hearing where she’s facing a disciplinary board that has the power to essentially remand her to indefinite solitary confinement,” Greer told the Guardian. “She has to face this board without her attorneys present. And now she’s being denied access to the resources to prepare a proper defence.

“Those things being denied paint a really grim picture of what it looks like the military’s trying to do to her, and should arouse suspicion from the public and from journalists.”

EU Law That Could Trash UK Internet Porn Filters Up For Voting

According to a proposed EU law, the UK's porn filters are illegal. The law would focus on roaming charges but would have far-reaching implications for net neutrality and the UK's adult content filters.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron's Internet porn filters, introduced in 2013, may be powerless. According to Patent Attorney Specialising in Information And Communications Technology for Withers & Rogers Denis Keseris, a foreigner demanding content available to them in their native countries will want to access content in the United Kingdom as well.

The Single Telecoms Market Law may mark the end of mobile phone roaming charges throughout the European Union from June 2017. It would "enshrine the principle of net neutrality into EU law". The laws would also stop blocking or throttling of online content, applications and services.

The European Parliament, Council and Commission all agree that the law will be the first to instate the clear rules on net neutrality at EU level.

While the UK does not prevent anyone access from Internet pornography, UK's Internet service providers could only operate on an opt-in basis for adult content. Cameron said that pornography and gratuitous violence must be automatically blocked by ISPs who opt not to view such media.

UK Law Firm Raises $50 Million In IPO

It can be quite rare for legal firms to raise very high value in the stock market especially if they’re new to the industry. Legal work is specialised. Measuring profits and return of investments definitely have a large margin of error.

A legal business observes the four following metrics for profitability, according to LexisNexis:

1.  Cost of Servicing Clients 
2.  Firm Profitability (Firm, Practice Area, Partners, Client, Timekeeper)
3.  Normal and Technological Expenditures
4.  Promotion and effort against service profit ratio All of these can be measured by actuaries.

While legal services have high prices, it doesn’t mean legal companies have a consistent stream of clients. It is also possible certain cases have been taking too long.

So how did the UK firm Gately increase their IPO to more than 15% during the morning when the London Stock Exchange opened? Gately first introduced 31.6 million shares, which represent a 30% stake in Gately. It had gained more than $45 million for individual partner with seven of them sharing about $38 million in value.

Gately may have offices in England, Scotland and Dubai, but it doesn’t mean it’s capable of having an increase of 15% in its stock value. The company’s ABS license is probably its number one weapon that allows it to raise its capital from outside its partnership.

Israel Had Hidden Behind Laws To Discriminate Against Arab Residential Construction

It seems that Israel’s court had ignored the fact that the Israel Government moved the residents from one area to the village of Umm al-Hiran 60 years ago. 

During the 1948 Nakba, Israel moved several removed Arabians from plotted land into the village of al-Hiran. For 60 years, the residents lived and thrived in the small village.

The Israel Supreme Court had faced legal battles against the initiatives of Israel because of its demolition of Arab. The activities had clearly brought serious shortage in housing for the Arab world.

According to Haaretz, the Israel court had ignored other legal principles that contributed to the situation.

Currently, Arab List Knesset members wish to use a team of experts to provide a solution to the Arab community housing shortage. They wish to freeze the Umm al-Hiran demolition order before they could uncover a solution to the problem.

However, Attorney General Yehuddah Weinstein insisted on the enforcement using the rule of law. An unfair decision according to Haaretz. 

They pointed out that the rule of law for Israelis are satisfactory, but the procedures to do so make it impossible to build a home on Israeli soil.